Quantcast
Channel: The Real Singapore - Politics
Viewing all 937 articles
Browse latest View live

Government Refuses To Renew Newspaper Permit For NSP's North Star News

$
0
0

Earlier today, the National Solidarity Party (“NSP”) lodged an Appeal to the President of Singapore.

We are appealing against the refusal by the Minister for Communications and Information (“MCI”) to renew the newspaper permit for our party organ, the ‘North Star News’.

Our Appeal is made pursuant to Section 21(8) of the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act, Cap. 206 (“the NPPA”), which states: “Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Minister or with any condition imposed by the Minister under this section may appeal to the President whose decision shall be final.”

We applied for the renewal on 13 June 2014. However, the MCI has refused to process the renewal unless all the members of our Central Executive Committee (“CEC”) disclose to MCI their monthly income/salary information.

unnamed (1)

Due to privacy and personal confidentiality, not all our CEC members have disclosed their monthly income/salary information. But MCI is insisting that they must do so, failing which our renewal application will not be processed.

We are aggrieved that MCI is withholding the Permit from us unless certain individuals, because they hold office as our CEC members, divulge to MCI financial information which is personal and private to such individuals, but which is otherwise not essential or relevant to a proper consideration by MCI of our renewal application.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

As a political party, we rely on our party organ, the North Star News to communicate our views and opinions to the electorate. The continuing delay is detrimental to our interests, and the detriment increases with each passing day. The Prime Minister may call for the next General Elections at any time.

The NPPA does not spell out the time frame within which the outcome of our Appeal to the President would be made known.

We hope the President will give his decision on our Appeal soonest as possible.

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, Secretary-General
On behalf of the 15th Central Executive Committee
of the NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PARTY

–A Summary of our Appeal of the grounds of our Appeal–

A full copy of our Appeal: http://bit.ly/1t26iPo

*Article first appeared on http://nsp.sg/2014/10/20/appeal-to-the-president-mci-refuses-to-process-...


ACRES Founder: I joined PAP because I want to bring change from within

$
0
0

AM I ENTERING POLITICS?

Many of you have asked if I will consider entering politics. Some have asked if I will join the PAP or the opposition such as the Worker’s Party. For more than a decade now, I’ve been actively speaking up, voicing my concerns constructively and campaigning for change. There is no doubt that things are indeed changing in Singapore for the better, for both the animals and the wider community.

I’ve given this serious thought for some time. My choice was to join the PAP.

The public knows me as a very strong advocate for animal welfare. While we may not see eye to eye on all issues, I have explored working with various MPs, political officeholders and government agencies in order to further the cause. I’ve seen that things can change when we work from within.

Many of you know that I’ve been working closely with Minister K Shanmugam Sc for the past five years, helping residents at his Meet-the-People Sessions, serving in the CCMC and also as the Animal Welfare and Environment Secretary in the Youth Executive Committee.

Through the many projects we launched, we made a significant difference for the community as well as advance animal welfare. We have been able to embark on pilot programmes for the keeping of cats in HDB flats and also end the culling of stray cats in Chong Pang.

On a wider and national scale, the annual Chong Pang Animal Protection Forums resulted in momentous animal protection policy changes in Singapore. The increased penalties for animal cruelty offences that will be discussed in Parliament next month is one of the best examples of our success.

This year, I’ve started serving in the Kembangan-Chai Chee constituency and will now initiate projects in this constituency under Minister Tan Chuan-Jin. We have many projects in the pipeline and will be rolling them out in the next few months and years.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Although I started out focusing on animal welfare, and will continue to do so, I have come to realise the impact that we can make on many fronts. I’m keen on also working on projects focusing on bringing back the kampong spirit and helping to break the poverty cycle in the less fortunate families.

I’ve now been working at the grassroots level, learning and gaining experience. My passion to serve the community will always remain the same, my commitment towards advocacy work remains steadfast and my determination to make this world a better place remains strong.

I want to stress that ACRES: Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Singapore) is and will always remain close to my heart.

Many of you have known me as Louis Ng from ACRES for the past 13 years. I remain the same person who passionately believes in making a difference.

 

Louis Ng

Founder and Executive Director

Animal Concerns Research and Education Society

Source: www.facebook.com/LouisACRES

 

Hong Kong Chief: 'Democracy would see poorer people dominate Hong Kong vote'

$
0
0

Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying told media that if the government met pro-democracy protesters’ demands it would result in the city’s poorer people dominating elections.

In an interview with foreign media, carried in the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times and the International New York Times, the embattled chief executive reiterated his position that free elections were impossible.

Demonstrators have paralysed parts of Hong Kong with mass rallies and road blockades for more than three weeks, in one of the biggest challenges to Beijing’s authority since the Tiananmen pro-democracy protests of 1989.

Leung’s comments were published just hours before talks between senior government officials and student leaders to end the impasse are scheduled to take place later on Tuesday.

China has offered Hongkongers the chance to vote for their next leader in 2017. But only those vetted by a committee expected to be loyal to Beijing will be allowed to stand - something protesters have labelled as “fake democracy”.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Tin Pei Ling: Marriages between Singaporeans and Foreigners is a complex issue

$
0
0

On Singaporean Families with Foreign Spouses

Lianhe Wanbao carried an article about foreign spouses on 20 Oct 2014 (see link at the bottom). Over the years, I have received quite a number of appeals for long(er) term stay by Singaporeans for their foreign spouses. In some cases, the circumstances were complex, involving former spouses (whom we must be fair to) or suspected scams (which we must guard against). These cases will need careful consideration by the authorities. In others, there were impassioned pleas for the Long Term Visit Pass/ Long Term Visit Pass Plus/ Permanent Residency to be granted to their foreign spouses so that the family can be whole. I am sympathetic towards appeals in the latter category and hope that the authorities can consider a more compassionate solution to address this issue. I had also spoken on this issue several times in Parliament. Singaporeans today are highly mobile and it will not be surprising if we observe more Singaporeans marrying foreigners. Hence, better to contemplate an up-to-date solution in preparation for the future than to react later. 

The following was what I had suggested in Parliament earlier this year during the Committee of Supply Debate:

Ms Tin Pei Ling (Marine Parade): Mdm Chair, last year, we debated on the Population White Paper and the House spoke at length from building a roadmap towards a sustainable population for an ageing Singapore. The pillars set out in the Paper were to build a strong Singaporean core. Many Singaporeans will agree, and I agree with this too. The good news is that apparently, most Singaporeans desire to get married and have kids. The recent Marriage and Parenthood study conducted in 2012 indicated that 83% of singles intend to get married and 84% of those who are married intend to have two or more children. To enable this, we must continue to shift our society and foster a pro-family culture by starting and raising a family take centre stage in our life choices. This involves aligning fundamental values, societal attitudes, practices exercised in settings such as at the workplace and, of course, Government policies. The Government has done a commendable job so far in being pro-Singaporean families with a generous Marriage and Parenthood Package, along with all the Baby Bonuses and the likes in the past. However, with so much emphasis on families, there is still one group of Singaporean families who may have been neglected. I am referring to the Singaporean families with foreign spouses. While they are not pure Singaporean families in that one spouse is foreign, as a whole they contribute to Singaporean core too.

The number of Singaporeans married to foreign spouses has been on the rise. Marriages registered between a Singaporean and a non-Singaporean make up about four in 10 of all marriages involving a Singaporean. In 2012 alone, there were about 7,017 marriages between Singaporeans and foreigners, up by about 15% from 2011’s figure. This is significant and possibly suggesting that such marriages will become a common sight. It may not be the majority but perhaps a more common sight in future. However, the certainty of long-term residency for the foreign spouses is a significant issue. There was a total of about 11,736 Long Term Visit Pass and Long Term Visit Pass Plus granted in 2012. It is a significant figure. However, what happens after these Long Term Passes expire? Not all graduates even become PRs; some never do. But the point is there are still families who are still grappling with much uncertainty and cannot plan their lives or do so confidently.

Because of the lack of certainty of stay, some who are financially sound become financially vulnerable. While some who are already struggling are now struggling even more because of single income source and travelling costs incurred by the foreign spouse. I give some examples during my Budget debate yesterday. Hence, there is great anxiety, frustration and fear of being separated. The problem is worse if they have children together. The hurdles that such couples have to overcome make me wonder if there is an indirect way of telling people who they can or cannot marry. Every country has its set of policies that not only reflect prevalent societal attitudes but is also a means of social engineering. This is understandable and perhaps the right thing to do for a government chosen by its people. But in this context, I struggle to reconcile the national move to increase and strengthen the Singaporean and enable families with difficulties, especially the low-income families with foreign spouses.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Marriage is sacred and everyone should have the freedom to choose who he or she wants to marry. Once married, it is a commitment and there are obligations that they have to each other. None of the Singaporeans with foreign spouses I met so far has thought of abandoning their foreign spouses, though some wondered if they should give up Singapore citizenship altogether to migrate overseas just so that the family can be whole. These Singaporeans have chosen their foreign spouses to share their lives with and these foreign spouses have also chosen to give up their homelands to be part of Singapore. Moreover, should they have children, the children would be born as Singaporeans given that at least one of the parents is a Singapore citizen.

Hence, would the Government consider an immigration progression roadmap specifically awarding Long Term Visit Pass Plus to foreign spouses upon marriage and then permanent residency after a definitive period of, say, 10 years? This will offer a greater sense of security to these families. There are, of course, concerns over marriage of convenience or engagement in illicit activities. Heavy penalties such as immediate revocation of the pass and permanent entry ban can be imposed in such instances. There are also concerns over the financial health of the family because of the additional family member in an already financially needy family. The unspoken question among some is perhaps whether this would inadvertently increase the financial liability to our nation. In light of this, I suggest that we incentivise these families by granting PR earlier if the foreign spouse gives birth to a Singaporean child and perhaps even earlier, if he or she finds a job with a stable income. The latter would help to strengthen a low-income family’s financial position. Assuming a scenario where the foreign spouse finds a low-skilled job as a stall helper, the pay can range from about $800 to $1,000 per month. The sum of money will significantly enhance the family’s income and bring more benefit than our usual PA assistance which would have been likely in a single-income source family.

Madam, marriage is sacred. It has to be a union between two consenting individuals. It is a personal choice. Against a backdrop of strengthening Singaporean core, I hope the Government will consider this favourably.

***

http://www.wanbao.com.sg/local/story20141020-39781

 

*Article first appeared on https://www.facebook.com/tinpeiling.official

Tan Jee Say: I urge the President to seek the truth about Operation Coldstore

$
0
0

The President (tony_tan@istana.gov.sg)

cc Prime Minister (lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg)

 

Dear President,

Early this year, I responded to your challenge issued during the 2011 Presidential Election TOC TV Forum that "one must be able to back up""the very serious charge" that "the Internal Security Act had been used for political purposes".

In my response [link], I referred to recently declassified British Government documents relating to Operation Coldstore which revealed that Lord Selkirk, the UK Commissioner to Singapore at that time, reported to Duncan Sandys, secretary of state for the colonies, that 'there is no important new evidence of subversive activity on which arrests at this juncture  can be justified. We could not substantiate a charge that they are planning to use violence. In the absence of specific evidence of subversion the arrests would be construed as an attempt by HMG to stifle legitimate opposition.' (Geoff Wade)

 

Independent check of archives in London 

As I have produced before you the evidence that you asked for, Singaporeans expected you to follow up on it. More than 8 months have passed, but you have neither replied my letter nor shown any interest or follow-up action to verify the evidence. Perhaps the declassified papers were too far away from Singapore but now that you are in London on a State visit, physical distance is not an issue. The documents are kept at the British National Archives in Kew, London which is about 8 miles or a short drive of 15-20 minutes, from Buckingham Palace where you are currently staying.  You can of course spend as much time as you want to go through the papers and satisfy yourself of their authenticity and accuracy. If this short journey or research work is too arduous for you to undertake, you can always request Her Majesty's Government to arrange for their intelligence officers to brief you. I am sure the HMG as gracious host, will be happy to oblige.

Your independent verification of the evidence is particularly important at this juncture in view of 2 recent events :

1. In disallowing the film "To Singapore, With Love" from public screening or distribution in Singapore, a documentary about political exiles who fled from Singapore, the Government has alleged that it contains "untruths and deceptions", designed to "whitewash their past actions" as " Communist Party of Malaya members and Communist United Front sympathisers" and

2. The Government has launched a reprint of Mr Lee Kuan Yew's radio broadcasts on The Battle For Merger of 1961 "'to provide a reality check' to attempts by some historians to recast the role played by communists and their supporters on the issue" (Straits Times, 10 Oct 2014).

 

Truth about the Merger

Singaporean historian Dr Thum Pingtjin, a Rhodes Scholar and Commonwealth Scholar educated at both Oxford and Harvard, has written about events leading to the battle for Merger in ARI Working Paper No. 211 'The Fundamental Issue is Anti-colonialism, Not Merger': Singapore's "Progressive Left", Operation Coldstore, and the Creation of Malaysia.

 

Citing the declassified British Government documents, he made the following points :

1." ....Lee engineered a 'Hobson's choice' (in the Merger Referendum) : he ensured that all alternatives to the PAP option were repugnant, leaving the public with no real choice. The British called this 'a dishonest manoeuvre' and the Tunku  'a dirty game' ....",

2. "... Under Lee's direction, Singapore Special Branch produced a paper describing an extensive communist conspiracy in Singapore, directed from the underground by the CPM and led in the open by Barisan politicians as part of a Communist "United Front". The Security Liaison Officer (SLO), Maurice Williams, tore apart the paper, noting numerous major deficiencies. Firstly, 'ín spite of intensive investigations, no evidence has been obtained' of a conspiracy, and that the paper's conclusions were entirely 'surmise'.  Secondly, sharing the goal of Singapore's independence with the Communists did not make someone a Communist sympathiser. Thirdly, it was ínconceivable that Secret Branch investigations would have failed to yield any evidence of such control  and direction' of a conspiracy of such massive breadth and scale. "Finally, the label Communist "United Front" was so broadly applied that it referred to anyone unhappy with the government. Thus, he concluded, 'The developments since August 1961 outlined in the paper do NOT support this conclusion' stated in the Special Branch paper, and strongly advised against repression.  

"Unable to proceed with arrests, the Federation and Singapore governments sought to provoke the Barisan into unconstitutional action on their  own.  A campaign of harassment against newspapers, publications, trade unions, and opposition politicians commenced.

"Meanwhile, Lee sought to go over Selkirk and appeal directly to his superiors in London. But when he met British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan in May 1962, Lee was forced to admit under close questioning that the Barisan leaders were merely 'stooges' and not leading Communists, and that the trade unions were no more communist than the Electrical Trades Union in Britain - i.e., not controlled by communists and functioning chiefly as a left-wing pressure group.111  .........."

 

Dr Thum's research paper, dated November 2013, can be accessed by clicking over this[link].

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Seek truth

Mr President, the Government is now disputing the accounts of historians even though they quoted, from official British Government documents,  the professional judgement of British Special Branch officers that those arrested were not communists or communist united front sympathisers but merely leftwing politicians and trade unionists opposed to the PAP. It is important that this fundamental matter be resolved as we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of our independence.

Mr President Sir, I urge you to get to the bottom of this issue, to seek and establish the truth by checking it out at the British National Archives in Kew, London during  your present State visit in the United Kingdom. You owe it to the people of Singapore to do so particularly when you asked for evidence to prove that the ISA had been used for political purposes.

 

Yours sincerely,

Tan Jee Say

 

Below is a screenshot of my open letter to the President in February 2014

 

 

This post is written by Mr Tan Jee Say, 2011 Presidential Candidate and the founder and current chairman of the Singaporeans First Party

*Article first appeared on https://www.facebook.com/notes/tan-jee-say/mr-president-i-urge-you-to-se...

Lim Chin Siong was never a communist?

$
0
0
As much as LKY wanted him to be a communist, he could never prove LCS as one, conclusively. Even if he was one, he would never publicly admit to be a member of the Communist Party of Malaya as that would land him in jail. The CPM was an outlawed organisation.
 
Similarly, a gangster would never admit to be a member of a secret society. And because criminal cases against prominent gangsters are so hard to clinch, we often find that these people are held in detention without trial under the CLTP, or what is commonly known as "Section 55" - albeit less controversially as compared to the ISA although technically they are similar.
 
The Plen, Chin Peng, etc, were clearly communists because they were the top leadership of the hierarchy and they eventually joined the armed struggle in Peace Villages in Southern Thailand. However, other communists who were tasked to work in the Communist United Front weren't so upfront with their allegiances as it was precisely their job to appear leftist, socialist, communalist; anything but communist, in order to continue to manage political affairs from behind the scenes.
 
How is it possible then for someone to say such and such person is highly likely a communist?

 

 

In this entry, we would look at the instances whereby LCS' deeds and association indicated that he could be a communist. While the information was sourced from Albert Lau's article titled "The Battle for Merger-The Historical Context", the original information was actually from various sources such as academic writings, memoirs and other periodicals.
 
If we read the body of evidence in its entirety, we will find that LCS' links with the communists cannot be simple.

Meeting with The Plen (CPM Singapre Chief) on various occassions
 

"Within days of the Malayan leader's speech (Tunku AR's speech on formation of Malaysia), Lim Chin Siong conferred with Fang Chuang Pi, one of the communists' top three leaders overseeing Singapore..."[Dennis Bloodworth, The Tiger and the Trojan Horse, p227]
 
"On 16 July (1961), a day after PAP lost Anson (to Workers' Party), Fang Chuang Pi again conferred secretly with Lim Chin Siong. Two days later, an urgent approach was made to see Lord Selkirk, the UK Commissioner, who invited the pro-communist group, which included Lim and three others, for tea the same day." [Sonny Yap, Richard Lim, and Leong Weng Kam, Men in White: The Untold Story of Singapore's Ruling Political Party, pp ix and 323] 

 

Click to enlarge

 

 
A member of the Anti-British League which was communist controlled
 
"Lim did admit to being a member of the underground Anti-British League (ABL) even though he insisted that "being in the ABL does not mean you are communist"...the ABL was...a dedicated clandestine arm of the CPM set up in September 1948 (after the Emergency was declared) for the purpose of overthrowing the British colonial government...the main duties of ABL members were to "learn revolutionary" and "undergo various clandestine activities such as recruiting new members, distributing flyers and putting up slogans"..They also purchased medicine and supplies to support the CPM's armed struggle."[Melanie Chiew, Leaders of Singapore, p118, Zhong Hua, "A Preliminary Study on the history of Singapore People's Anti-British League and Zhou Guang, 'First Anti-British League group in Singapore Chinese High School in Mainstays of the Anti-Colonial Movement; The Legendary Figures of the Singapore People's Anti-British League ]
 
"According to Bloodworth, Lim had reportedly initiated a Chinese High School student activist, Seet Chay Tuan, into the ABL. Seet "remembered the night the previous year he was summoned to a secret rendezvous...and stood obediently in front of a picture of Stalin pinned to a wooden post, his fist raised, while Chin Siong read out a declaration of allegiance which he was then to swear and sign with his new Party name and so become a full member of the 'Organisation'."" [Bloodworth, p69]

 

Click to enlarge 

Oral History of Devan Nair
 

"Nair recalled how Samad Ismail, a CPM member since 1949, had introduced him to Lim and that "Chin Siong was getting his guidance then from South Johor. Nair, who used to spend his evenings and nights at Lim's Middle Road union headquarters, remembered occasions when "somebody from the underground who is not know to the police" arriving to pass Lim a note. "And Chin Siong would read it and straight away burn it." [Devan Nair, Transcript of Oral History Interview]

Essay of CPM member Zhang Taiyong
 

"In his essay in the 2013 book, Zhang disclosed that the CPM had transferred Lim from underground activities in the ABL to open front work. After Lim's explusion from the Chinese High School for his role in an examination boycott, he "continued his studies at an English-stream school but later accepted the organisation's decision and devoted himself to trade union movement and constitutional struggle." [Zhang Taiyong, "Our cohort's commander - Lu Yexun" in Mainstays of the Anti-Colonial Movement, p61] 
 
Retired Malaysian Special Branch officer Aloysius Chin
 
"the Senior Assistant Commissioner of Police who held a long-standing watch over the communists in Malaya, also divulged that CPM leaders Siu Cheong and Ah Hoi cited Lim as an example of CPM members who were deployed in open front activities in political parties" [Aloysius Chin, The Communist Party of Malaya, The Inside Story, p67]

Documents in LCS' handwriting
 

"Two documents in Lim's own handwriting were among several he wrote for CPM records and for the instruction of recruits to the CPM who were under his leadership. One of them was on the talk he gave in the commemoration of Stalin's death. Another contained guidance notes for his ABL subordinates on the CPM's secret journal STUDY." 

 

Click to enlarge

 

LKY's challenge to LCS after accusing him of being a communist
 
"Lim Chin Siong issued a signed statement accusing the prime minister of "sensationalism". To Lim's retort that he was "sick and tired" of having to deny association with communists, Lee Kuan Yew gave this risposte at a press conference on 27 January 1962: "If the documents were not written by him, he should deny it, sue me and the Government printers for libel and forgery." Lim never did. 

 

Click to enlarge
Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 
And former Director of Internal Security Branch, Yoong Siew Wah, when writing on his own blog noted the following:
 
"It was a well-known fact that Lim Chin Siong, the former general secretary of the powerful Singapore Factory & Shop Workers Union was the undisputed leader of the communist united front and controlled the mass base. Lee Kuan Yew could not have been unaware of this fact and knew that he had to depend on Lim Chin Siong and his mass base to advance his political ambition."
 
So while there are mentions in British archives to suggest that LCS was not a communist, it should be noted that those who say otherwise are aplenty.  
 
 
 
Kampong Academics

*The author blogs at http://unravelling1987.blogspot.sg

 

SDP: Freedom of expression important now more than ever

$
0
0

Many Singaporeans have, in years past, questioned the SDP's fight for political freedom for our people. They say that these ideas have little to do with their everyday lives. Fortunately, such thinking is on the wane.

It must be reiterated that without such freedoms, especially the freedom of expression, citizens cannot hold those who rule over us accountable and make them serve the people instead of themselves.

For example, our retirees' hopes to have their CPF savings returned to them, the younger generation's aspirations to be able to afford HDB flats, the people's desire to live in a city not crammed beyond its limit and so on all necessitate the public's ability to voice out its concerns.

This is the reason why the PAP, once it assumed power in 1959, moved hand over fist to ensure that it closed down the various avenues where the people could exercise that right. Newspapers were brought under the management of the state, journalists were detained without trial, public political meetings were outlawed, strikes were prohibited and the Law Society was gagged.

It is for our own sakes that we work to claim back our rights to freedom of expression.

There is another reason why democratic freedoms are important. In order for Singapore to gain preeminence in international law and become a First World country, we need to adopt full democratic practices.

The rule of law, including widening the rules on freedom of expression, is an essential ingredient in our bid to be a modern legal centre in Asia and the world. Unfortunately, the PAP's continued clamp down on Singaporeans' democratic rights runs counter to this endeavour.

This is the subject of Dr Chee Soon Juan's address at the International Bar Association's (IBA) conference taking place in Tokyo this week. The SDP leader will make the case that the PAP Government has to make significant progress in the democratisation of Singapore in order for the country to be part of the international legal framework.

Unfortunately, the Government seems bent on preventing this. An opportunity came in 2007 when the IBA held its conference in Singapore. Instead of demonstrating leadership by committing to the rule of law, the PAP tried to prevent the symposium from being opened to the public. It failed.

This allowed Dr Chee to attend the event in which then Minister for Law, Mr S Jayakumar, was a speaker. Mr Jayakumar insisted that the rule of law needed to be “contextualised” to suit the needs of different cultures – an argument widely discredited by the international community.

Dr Chee rose to challenge Mr Jayakumar's point, citing the case of Mr Chia Thye Poh who was imprisoned without trial for 32 years. The session chair then intervened and tried to stop Dr Chee from saying more.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

“The Government has had its say. Now I'm sure the audience would like to hear the other side of the story,” Dr Chee said, turning to the audience which broke out into a loud and sustained applause. He informed those present of the use of defamation laws and criminal prosecution to silence dissent.

Mr Jayakumar responded by evading Dr Chee's questions and resorted to personally attacking him. When the minister finished, no one applauded.

Read also Jayakumar evades Chee's questions

It seems that the situation has come full circle. Dr Chee will be speaking on the same platform that Mr Jayakumar did in 2007. But instead defending anti-democratic practices, the SDP secretary-general will be calling for the political rights of Singaporeans to be respected.

 

Source: YourSDP.org

Workers' Party Youth Hammer at Dhoby Ghaut

$
0
0

Last Friday evening, members of the Workers’ Party Youth Wing (WPYW) were out and about reaching out to young Singaporeans. With the party’s newsletter, The Hammer, and publicity materials for the youth wing’s next activity, a Christmas Party at a home for the intellectually disabled in tow, youth wing members fanned out across Dhoby Ghaut.

Youth Hammer was an excellent opportunity for youth wing members to create greater awareness of the political context in Singapore. Many stopped by to ask questions and youth wing members were on hand to answer their questions, though with some trepidation at the first time of asking.

It was a great learning experience for many of the new and young activists. And it was encouraging to see the synergy on display. The responses from young Singaporeans were very encouraging and many left their email and contact details behind, indicating their interest to be updated on future youth wing activities.

If you are interested to sign up as a volunteer for our next community event on 7 December 2014 (pre-registration is required due to security requirements at the home we are visiting), do email Allan Goh at allan.goh@wp.sg.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

We look forward to hearing and learning from you. Don’t shy away from the blues and we will see you soon!

 

Source: http://wpyouth.sg


NSP: Establish a Public Interest Declassification Board

$
0
0

BELOW IS A PRESS RELEASE FROM THE NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PARTY ON 23 OCTOBER 2014:

A clear understanding of our nation’s history is key to building a strong, unified nation.  A Public Interest Declassification Board will serve to plug the gaps in our collective social memory, thus playing a vital role in nation-building. 

Earlier this month, the PAP Government launched a reprint of ‘The Battle for Merger’, a compilation of speeches made by Mr Lee Kuan Yew in 1961 and originally published in 1962.

In his speech at the book’s launch, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said that book would “provide a reality check” to attempts by some historians to recast the role played by communists and their supporters on the issue.

They portray the fight as merely a peaceful and democratic disagreement over the type of merger. They ignore the more fundamental agenda of the communists to seize power by subversion and armed revolution,” he said. [1]

The PAP Government’s re-publication comes as it classified a documentary by Singaporean filmmaker Tan Pin Pin, ‘To Singapore with Love’ as ‘Not allowed for all ratings’, which means it cannot be screened in public or distributed within Singapore.

According to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the film is “a self-serving personal account, conveniently inaccurate in places, glossing over facts in others“.[2]

Ironically, at least one academic has made similar allegations about “The ‘Battle for Merger’ – i.e. that it is “self-serving”.[3]

Another academic,  Dr Hong Lysa, commenting on ‘Operation Coldstore’ (another security operation launched in Singapore on 2 February 1963 in which about 111 anti-merger activists were arrested and detained) says in her blog entry[4]that “revisionist history” challenges the PAP Story and tells of the “struggle between the ‘pseudo-anticolonialist right-wing’ and the ‘genuine socialist anti-colonialists’.

While the Media Development Board has classified Tan Pin Pin’s film ‘Not rated for public viewing”, it has not banned the film.  The general public are entitled to view the film privately.  In any case, hundreds of Singaporeans have already crossed the border to watch the film in Malaysia when it was screened as part of a film festival there.

By now, most informed citizens would have heard the Government’s narrative of the events leading to our independence. They would also have access to the various ‘revisionist histories’.

declassified

How do these citizens decide for themselves which one they should believe?  If we accept the axiom “History is written by the victors” then the scepticism that a considerable number of such citizens would have regarding the official narrative is understandable.

As our 50th anniversary of independence draws near, there is considerable public interest in the history of modern Singapore.  At the same time, there seems to be huge gap in our collective social memory.

In March this year, a call was made for the Government to bridge this gap by legislating a thirty-year rule Declassification Act, where Cabinet papers are released to the public domain after a thirty-year period.  The Government responded that it would not be not prepared to enact such a legislation.  It said that it would release information only to encourage good governance[5].

This discretion that the Government exercises as to which information it should release and which it should not, is not in the interest of the general public. The Government had previously clarified in Parliament that public interest is “not sufficient reason to disclose information[6].

The Government’s reluctance to declassify some of these documents is understandable when the classified papers relate to national defence, foreign relations and internal security.  The Government should have regard to public interest – especially when it is on the issue of collective social memory, for it is only with such a memory that we can build a strong, unified nation.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

It is for this reason that the National Solidarity Party calls for the Government to establish a Public Interest Declassification Board – an advisory committee with the mandate to promote the fullest possible public access to a thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of extraordinary public interest. The members of this Board should comprise of elected Members of Parliament from the different political parties, reputable members of civil society and academics.

It is unreasonable for the Governing Party to assuage the general public to trust its discretion in such matters especially when the same Party has been the Government for over 50 years.  Clearly, there are chances that such discretion may be exercised in a self-serving manner.

Especially when Singapore does not have legislation like the Freedom of Information Act or the Declassification Act, the establishment of Public Interest Declassification Board will demonstrate to the general public that matters of public interest are important to the Government, and that it is prepared to release classified papers provided they do not compromise matters of security and/or sensitive matters of bilateral relationship with other countries.

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, Secretary-General
On behalf of the 15th Central Executive Committee
of the NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PARTY

[3] “Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-building Project” By Michael D. Barr at Page 28

[6] Parliamentary Debates on “CEO-DESIGNATE OF TEMASEK HOLDINGS (Resignation)” 18-08-2009 at Column: 936 found at this link: http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00003510-WA&curr...

 

Source: http://nsp.sg

 

Anwar Ibrahim: Malaysia have Bigger problems in the country than touching dogs

$
0
0

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim joins the crowd at last night's 'Rakyat Hakim Negara' gathering in Seberang Jaya. – The Malaysian Insider pic by Hasnoor Hussain, October 23, 2014.Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said there are bigger problems in the country than the recent "I want to touch a dog" event which he said has been turned into "a national issue that threatens the nation".

"There are Muslims who are involved in gambling firms and beer companies. A minister's family member has a multi-million ringgit security labelling contract for liquor and beer.

"Have the ustazs said anything about this and about big shots who consume alcohol?" he said at a "Rakyat Hakim Negara" gathering in Seberang Jaya last night.

The "I want to touch a dog" event in Bandar Utama last Sunday drew more than 1,000 people, including Muslims, but its organiser, Syed Azmi Al-Habshi, has since become a victim of abuse online and even received death threats.

The event, which was aimed at helping people to overcome their fear of dogs and to understand canines better, infuriated religious authorities, with some Muslims condemning it as an attempt to insult the ulama (clerics).

Anwar said he was asked on Twitter if he supported the act of Muslims touching dogs, which were regarded as 'unclean' animals.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

"I said no. If (a Muslim) wants the touch a dog, just 'samak' (cleanse) after that. What is the big problem?

"A national issue that threatens the country is now young people (Muslims) wanting to touch dogs?"

Anwar joked if Muslims would also have trouble touching money previously in the hands of the Chinese who eat pork.

 

Read the rest of the article here: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/bigger-problems-in-t...

Overcoming the deafening silence: Low Thia Khiang

$
0
0

by Justin Zhuang

— January 19th, 2009, 11.03pm

This article was published by The Enquirer, which calls itself “an independent student media based in Nanyang Technological University”. The original website of the publication, enquirer.sg, is no longer available, though its facebook page can be found here.

 

He may need aid to hear you clearly, but the leader of The Workers’ Party needs no help in speaking up–Photo: Sam Kang Li

For someone who is critical of the government for being deaf to its citizen’s opinions, especially in the past, the leader of Singapore’s largest opposition political party, The Workers’ Party (WP), is ironically half-deaf himself.

As Mr Low Thia Khiang puts on his hearing aids at the start of the interview, the 52-year-old said he lost 50 per cent of high frequency hearing in both ears probably from not wearing earplugs at the shooting range during his National Service when he served as an instructor.

The severity of the problem did not hit Mr Low until he realised he could not hear during Parliament. He was seeking clarification but then-Speaker Tan Soo Khoon told him to sit down and wait for the others to finish. “But I carried on, and he thought this guy was trying to be funny,” he said.

At first Mr Low wondered why the Speaker was so angry and it was only after the session that he realised what had gone wrong.

As if being hard of hearing is not bad enough, Mr Low has problems with his English too. At the last general election, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew had questioned if an apology letter written in English for Mr Low’s party candidate, Mr James Gomez, was really written by him.

“Of course, my English is not as good as MM Lee’s. But, his Chinese is definitely not better than mine.”While MM Lee was accurate in his observation – Mr Gomez had written the letter while Mr Low only edited it — the latter found it nothing to be ashamed of. He even told the press, “Of course, my English is not as good as MM Lee’s. But, his Chinese is definitely not better than mine.”

And Mr Low readily confesses that he got an F9 for English in both his A-Levels and O-Levels. As the last batch of students from the former Nanyang University (Nantah), he belongs to a dying community of Singaporeans educated in the Chinese medium at a time when the country was switching to English as its medium of instruction in schools.

Then Prime Minister Lee had made a speech at Nantah where he labelled it a third-class university as compared to Cambridge, Oxford and then University of Singapore (SU), Mr Low recalls. This was why in 1980, during Mr Low’s final examinations, it was announced that the National University of Singapore would form by merging Nantah with SU.

“They call it a merger, but to me it’s a closing down of Nantah,” he is quick to correct.

The young Mr Low was outraged with the decision, and so were many of the other students. Together with some friends, they put up protest posters around the Nantah campus, wrote letters to the press and even snagged an interview with a journalist from a Chinese paper.

“I asked myself as a citizen of Singapore, if there is something which I feel that is unjust, something that is not right, probably people will not know because if press don’t report, who knows?”“Amazingly, nothing came out… the whole public opinion was so one-sided,” he boomed. For the first time, Mr Low saw how public opinion in Singapore could be engineered to favour those in power, “I asked myself as a citizen of Singapore, if there is something which I feel that is unjust, something that is not right, probably people will not know because if press don’t report, who knows?”

 

The Final Straw

Mr Low grew up in a family of five and his sisters brought him up after their parents passed away when he was only in secondary school. As a student in Chung Cheng (Main) he almost got expelled for disciplinary problems.

Fortunately, his principal was merciful and Mr Low eventually enrolled in Nantah, majoring in both Chinese Language and Literature and Government and Political Administration.

It was his interest in the latter and the desire to read Western political thinkers like Plato and Max Weber that spurred Mr Low to brush up his English in university. But by the time he was to pursue honours in the newly opened NUS, he was still not confident enough in his English.

Thus, the political science department’s warning that theses would be marked down for poor English coupled with the discrimination he felt from the department towards the Chinese-educated pushed him to do his honours in Chinese Studies instead.

After graduation, he became a Chinese-language teacher at Pei Dao Secondary where he encountered the final straw that led him into politics. “To face a student everyday, knowing they are not slow learners but they will not make it because of the system, I can’t tell the student that,” he said.

Seeing his normal stream students demoralised by the system frustrated the young teacher. “Are they slow learners? Today, after so many years, I am proven right because many of them are very successful.” he said.

But Mr Low could not wait to be vindicated and quit teaching after only two years. By then, the contracting business he started while teaching had taken off and he was already a member of the WP led by the late Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam. One of the earliest things he did was to push the party to make streaming an issue in the 1984 elections.

“Of course, the ruling government will never admit that this is from pressure from the ground, from the opposition… you can’t claim credit, but it’s ok, at least you can see some changes.”Today, that education system that finally drove Mr Low to join the WP in 1982 has changed for the better. “Of course, the ruling government will never admit that this is from pressure from the ground, from the opposition… you can’t claim credit, but it’s ok, at least you can see some changes.”

And it is seeing his efforts improve the lives for Singaporeans that keeps him going after over 20 years in politics.

Apathy is not an Issue

While he has not thought of his retirement plans, party renewal is not far away from the party chief’s mind, “I will have to give up one day, will there be people who will move the party forward or that’s the end?”

Mr Low’s biggest concern is that the party still does not have enough people — quantity and quality — to form an alternative government today and he admits that to join opposition politics takes a certain breed of people who are willing to toil away.

“Not true what, my life has never been difficult, whether in business or in life. People use it as an excuse.”But he is quick to rubbish the myth that it is dangerous to be associated with opposition politics, “Not true what, my life has never been difficult, whether in business or in life. People use it as an excuse.”

He recalls that he joined WP while still a teacher and his vice-principal used to keep newspaper cuttings of him and his colleagues speculated when he would be sacked. “To me, I deliver, I do my job… what is there reason for you to sack me?” he said.

The apathy of the youth towards politics does not worry the father of three either. He keeps an open mind on the issue as he thinks the youth have diverse interests and it may simply not be the right time for them to be interested anyway. For those who want to take up politics, his advice is to join a party with “eyes open”, understand the party and its objectives and be prepared for any possible outcome.

 

Now or Never

Mr Low himself had much to deliberate before he joined the WP. His children were young and many like him would have waited a little longer. Moreover, it was a time of uncertainty for opposition politicians as people were arrested under the Internal Security Act.

But for Mr Low, it was a case of now or never, and he candidly told his wife before joining the party, “One day I might have to go to jail.”

But he never did.

After losing his maiden elections in Tiong Bahru GRC in 1988, Low won the single-seat ward in Hougang in 1991 and has not looked back. In the last elections in 2006, he even won with his biggest margin ever.

A big factor of his success lies in Mr Low’s style of politics that has earned him praise even from the ruling People’s Action Party as the kind of opposition acceptable to them.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Perhaps, one of the three calligraphy piece that adorns his office wall best describes the Buddhist’s approach to politics. Inspired by the Chan Zong teaching, it loosely translates to read that no matter what happens in the surroundings, one should not be distracted and stay calm inside.

Such a Zen-like approach differs sharply from his predecessor, Jeyaretnam’s fiery-brand of politics. Mr Low is terse when speaking about the man whom he took over as WP’s Secretary-General in 2001 in less than amicable terms.

Mr Jeyaretnam had then accused the WP and Mr Low for not helping him out with his debts incurred from the defamation suits he had to face from the PAP leaders.

What Mr Jeyaretnam went through showed Mr Low the political traps that he had to avoid to survive. And as if to distance himself from the man, he adds, “Being a leader to me is about responsibility, when the party entangles, you demoralise everybody, you also discourage people who may be interested.”

For critics who say the WP is not aggressive enough and too similar to the PAP, he assures them that the party is confident of its approach and why they are doing it.

The WP acts as a check on the government to make it accountable and provides Singaporeans with a choice to make sure the democracy here work, says Mr Low.

This is especially important when the government here often makes decisions with little consultation, and this was the biggest problem he saw when he entered politics.

“There is no compromise, even though people feel it is not in interest of the nation, but you can’t say anything, who is going to hear you? Not even the news. So best way is to get into politics, so that when I ask question in Parliament, you have to answer, and you better answer!” he said.

Since his days at Nantah, he remains sceptical of the local press and is selective to the journalists he speaks to. When Mr Low first got elected he told the press an important reason why he won was because he was never interviewed by them. He thinks that journalists need to have a sense of mission and has met only a few who dare to push the boundaries.

Mr Low sees himself as the voice of the voiceless and despite his plain, and at times broken English, one hears a man who wants to speak up against the injustices in the Singapore system. “I was born here, this is my country. If I think there is wrong, I will fight,” he said, thumping the table to bring the point home.

The Enquirer Editor’s note: In the earlier version of our article, we wrote that Mr Low, together with some friends, “put up protest posters around the island” in response to the merger between Nantah and SU. Mr Low did not put up posters around the island, but only within the Nantah Campus. We changed the sentence at 1247am, April 23, 2011.

 

 

*Article first appeared on http://tnesingapore.wordpress.com/2014/10/25/overcoming-the-deafening-si...

 

M'sia warns Muslims not to take part in Halloween as it is against M'sian culture

$
0
0

<pic credit: Dawn Yang>

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25 — Several Malaysia Muslim groups are now training their guns on the coming Halloween festival, warning that the annual event to remember the dead is part of Western culture and could wrongly influence local Muslim youths.

Ikatan Guru Muslim Malaysia (IGMM) deputy president Mohd Azizee Hassan said that the Halloween celebration is inappropriate as it clashes with Malaysian culture and traditions. According to a Sinar Harian Online report, banners promoting the October 31 event at a Seremban international school have triggered unease among the Muslim residents in the Negeri Sembilan township.

Halloween has its origins in the ancient Celtic festival known as Samhain, and is celebrated every year on October 31, which is the eve of the Western Christian feast All Hallow’s Day or All Saints’ Day.

“I do not support such events because it could dilute the identities of the Muslim students in the said school,” Mohd Azizee was quoted saying in the Malay daily’s report today.

“Although the programme organisers have said that there are no religious elements in the event, it still shouldn’t be so heavily promoted as though we endorse such a festival.

“I worry that if the programme proceeds, it could destroy and threaten the faith of our Muslim students in the school,” he added.

Mohd Azizee also urged the state education department to look into the matter.

Right-wing Muslim group Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma) has also waded into the issue, urging the state authorities, including the Negeri Sembilan Islamic Religious Council (Mains), to monitor the event.

Sinar Harian Online cited Isma central committee member Mohd Hazizi Ab Rahman as saying that the Halloween event should be canned as it is not Islamic.

The daily also quoted him labelling the organisers bold for openly promoting the event in Bahasa Malaysia.

Malay rights groups like Isma and Perkasa have previously hit out at a number of events that they claimed could possibly ruin Malaysia’s image as an Islamic country and bring ruin to the nation.

One such event is the Oktoberfest beer festival, which was held at a shopping mall car park in Selangor.

Although the event was promoted to non-Muslims, the conservative Muslim groups urged their supporters to rally against the event and venues that serve alcohol as part of the festival.

Last Sunday, a young Malaysian Muslim invited flak when he organised the “I Want to Touch a Dog” event at the Central Park in Bandar Utama, an event he said was merely to offer Malay-Muslims here the opportunity to pet canines, an animal that many in the community regard as culturally taboo.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Muslim leaders from both sides of the political divide have since been up in arms over the event, claiming that it was deviant and could lead Muslims astray from the country’s accepted form of Sunni ideology.

There have since been allegations circulating online claiming that the organiser of the October 19 event, Syed Azmi Alhabshi, is Christian from a so-called Malay church based in Jalan Gasing in Petaling Jaya who was trying to convert Muslims.

Syed Azmi has received death threats for organising the event — which was approved by the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS), though the state body later claimed that the organisers had deviated from their proposed objective to enlighten and educate Muslims on the position of dogs in the faith.

Earlier today, Syed Azmi apologised over the furore caused by the event, saying he had not meant to hurt the sensitivities of his fellow Muslims.

 

Source: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/after-oktoberfest-and...

'To Singapore with Love' is a no show at Malaysia's film fest

$
0
0

Around 15 officers from the Ministry of Home Affairs turned up at the Freedom Film Fest in Georgetown, Penang yesterday requesting the organisers to stop screening the film, To Singapore With Love.

The officers cited that the film has not been vetted and approved by the Malaysian film censor board.

Anna Har, Executive Director, of Komas, in press statement said that, after about half-an-hour of negotiation with the organisers, Penang state assemblyperson, , Ng Aik Wei and Cheah Kah Peng, the screening was allowed.

It was allowed to continue on the" basis that it was a state sponsored event and that organisers were streaming the films online and thus not in the jurisdiction of the film censorship act.

"We are thankful that the officers were co-operative and understood the context of our event and allowed us to continue the screening undisrupted this time.

Nevertheless the continued efforts from the authorities to pre-censor the films we screen is regrettable. Ideally, the government should work together with us in our efforts to increase awareness and discourse on human rights which contributes to the process of nation building," said Jerald Joseph, board of director of Komas.

 

'Films open minds'

"Pusat Komas, a human rights NGO established since 1993 is proud to be part of an ASEAN community that encourages peoples involvement in nation building processes through films that educate and open minds.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

"FreedomFilmFestival (FFF) does just that for the past 12 years. It is one of Malaysia's most established annual human rights film festival," added the statement by Anna Har.

"We salute the Malaysians for joining us for years in opening critical discourse spaces on various human rights issues in Malaysia and elsewhere.

"What is meant to be a celebration of arts and human rights space has been severely attacked and intimidated by strong arm governments tactics."

"We speak specifically about the film "To Singapore, With Love" by Singaporean filmmaker Tan Pin Pin (left); which to our standards meets the criteria of a film that speaks of human rights issues be it present or past."

 

*Article first appeared on http://rakyattimes.com/~wolf/index.php/news/1456-to-singapore-with-love-...

 

SDP: It's about you, our fellow citizens

$
0
0

Members of the SDP were out and about in Marsiling and Bukit Panjang estates this morning continuing with our campaign to get into Parliament to speak up for our fellow citizens.

We were heartened by the many handshakes and voices of support as we went from block to block and table to table greeting the thousands of residents as they went about their breakfast and marketing on a Sunday morning. 

We were greeted with heartwarming smiles as residents stopped to chat and, with the ubiquitous smartphones, paused for the inevitable photographs.

"You have our support," many said in response as we told them about our effort to get into Parliament so that we can be a check on the Government. 

A glass of kopi now costs $1.20, a elderly man said: "Want to have breakfast now also so expensive."

Another senior citizen said that the opposition must raise the issue of the COE.

"How to do business like that?" he told us in Mandarin. "We need cars to fetch our goods. You all must bring up this issue."

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

The feedback throughout the morning was one of disappointment as many people spoke up about the continued rise in the cost of living. 

The walkabout is part of our Road to 2016 campaign that we started immediately after the last elections in 2011. We will be stepping up our ground effort as we approach 2015 which could see a snap elections being held.

We're spreading the message about our alternative policies and explaining to the people how these policies will benefit them, including policies on housing, population, healthcare, ministers' salaries and education. 

We will present them to the electorate at the GE and we're looking forward to your support.

 

Source: YourSDP.org

 

‘World's Poorest President' Explains Why We Should Kick Rich People Out Of Politics

$
0
0

People who like money too much ought to be kicked out of politics, Uruguayan President José Mujica told CNN en Español in an interview posted online Wednesday.

“We invented this thing called representative democracy, where we say the majority is who decides,” Mujica said in the interview. “So it seems to me that we [heads of state] should live like the majority and not like the minority.”

Dubbed the “World’s Poorest President” in a widely circulated BBC piece from 2012, Mujica reportedly donates 90 percent of his salary to charity. Mujica’s example offers a strong contrast to the United States, where in politics the median member of Congress is worth more than $1 million and corporations have many of the same rights as individuals when it comes to donating to political campaigns.

“The red carpet, people who play -- those things,” Mujica said, mimicking a person playing a cornet. “All those things are feudal leftovers. And the staff that surrounds the president are like the old court.”

Mujica explained that he didn’t have anything against rich people, per se, but he doesn’t think they do a good job representing the interests of the majority of people who aren’t rich.

“I’m not against people who have money, who like money, who go crazy for money,” Mujica said. “But in politics we have to separate them. We have to run people who love money too much out of politics, they’re a danger in politics… People who love money should dedicate themselves to industry, to commerce, to multiply wealth. But politics is the struggle for the happiness of all.”

Asked why rich people make bad representatives of poor people, Mujica said: “They tend to view the world through their perspective, which is the perspective of money. Even when operating with good intentions, the perspective they have of the world, of life, of their decisions, is informed by wealth. If we live in a world where the majority is supposed to govern, we have to try to root our perspective in that of the majority, not the minority.”

Mujica has become well known for rejecting the symbols of wealth. In an interview in May, he lashed out against neckties in comments on Spanish television that went viral.

“The tie is a useless rag that constrains your neck,” Mujica said during the interview. “I’m an enemy of consumerism. Because of this hyperconsumerism, we’re forgetting about fundamental things and wasting human strength on frivolities that have little to do with human happiness.”

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

He lives on a small farm on the outskirts of the capital of Montevideo with his wife, Uruguayan Sen. Lucia Topolansky and their three-legged dog Manuela. He says he rejects materialism because it would rob him of the time he uses to enjoy his passions, like tending to his flower farm and working outside.

“I don’t have the hands of a president,” Mujica told CNN. “They’re kind of mangled.”

Watch the whole interview in Spanish at CNN.

 

[Via: The World Post]


SDP: Dr Chee to speak in Hong Kong on inequality and freedom

$
0
0

The SDP will attend a conference in Hong Kong titled “Promoting Growth, Reducing Inequality” from 6-8 November 2014. The delegation comprises Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan, Assistant Secretary-General Chris Ang and Assistant Treasurer Jaslyn Go.

Dr Chee will be speaking at the event which will bring together delegates from research institutes, think tanks, political parties, and the business community to discuss the interplay between growth and inequality as well as how the liberal economy relates to wealth creation and disparity.

The conference is jointly organised by the Liberal International and the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats.

Dr Chee will also be speaking at the City University of Hong Kong on the topic “Democracy and the Market Economy: Examples of Hong Kong and Singapore.”

"Singapore shares many of the characteristics that the Hong Kong society possesses," says Dr Chee, “Both economies vie to be financial strongholds and are dependent on open trade. But the cities are also plagued by high income inequality, reduced opportunity for the younger generation, and lack of democracy," he said.

Some of the questions Dr Chee will address are: How will such political control affect the development of the two cities, both socially and economically? How will the respective governments react to such pressures for change? And how can the opposition help to effect change?

"While Hong Kongers enjoy political freedom, Singaporeans are still mired in one-party rule where elections although conducted regularly are far from free and fair. Fundamental freedoms of speech, assembly and association are also severely curtailed in Singapore," says Dr Chee.

The dangers that non-open and undemocratic systems engender, which is the vital participation of the masses in regenerating and re-vitalising an economy, are of particular concern for Singapore.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Like Hong Kong, Singapore is undoubtedly at a crossroads and the path the ruling People's Action Party chooses will have an impact not just for the ruling party but also for the country in the years to come.

Dr Chee will also use the opportunity to meet with Singaporeans in Hong Kong and to discuss the SDP's efforts to win its contests at the next general election.

He was in Tokyo last week to speak at the International Bar Association's annual conference.

 

Source: YourSDP.org

Amnesty International: End persecution of Anwar Ibrahim and other govt critics

$
0
0

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE (27 October 2014)

The Malaysian authorities should end their politically motivated persecution of government critics including Anwar Ibrahim, Amnesty International said ahead of the final decision in the long-standing ‘sodomy’ case against the opposition leader.

“The ‘sodomy’ charges against Anwar Ibrahim are clearly politically motivated and a blatant attempt by the Malaysian authorities to silence and undermine a critical voice. If Anwar Ibrahim is jailed, Amnesty International will consider him a prisoner of conscience,” said Richard Bennett, Amnesty International’s Asia Pacific Director.

“Tomorrow’s decision also has to be seen in the context of a wider clampdown on critics in Malaysia. Over the past months, the authorities have increasingly made use of draconian laws to silence opposition voices and other activists – this must end.”  

The “sodomy” case against Anwar Ibrahim, the leader of the opposition People's Justice Party (Parti Keadilan Rakyat), began in 2008. The High Court cleared him of all charges in 2012, but the Court of Appeal overturned the acquittal in March this year and sentenced him to five years in prison. 

The opposition leader has been on bail ever since and appealed the decision to the Federal Court, the highest court in the country, which will make its final decision on 28-29 October. If found guilty, Anwar Ibrahim could face a jail term.

“Tomorrow the Federal Court has an opportunity to demonstrate the independence of the Malaysian judiciary from political interference,” said Richard Bennett.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Wider crackdown

This year the government has made increasing use of another colonial-era piece of legislation that the authorities use to charge and imprison critics – the Sedition Act.

Two people have been convicted of sedition this year, with at least a dozen others currently facing charges solely for peacefully expressing their views. Scores more have been investigated for “seditious” activities – Anwar Ibrahim himself was placed under investigation for sedition in September.

In July 2012 Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak publically committed to repealing the law stating that it represented “a bygone era”, but over two years later his promise remains unfulfilled.

“The Malaysian government’s widespread use of the Sedition Act is not just an attempt to silence certain individuals but is creating a wider climate of fear,” said Richard Bennett.

“The Prime Minister should stick to his promise – the draconian Sedition Act must be repealed or amended to bring it in line with international standards.”

Repeal ‘sodomy’ law

This is not the first time that Anwar Ibrahim has been jailed. In 1998, after calling for political reform, then Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim was dismissed from government and arrested for corruption and committing ‘illegal’ homosexual acts – allegations he has always denied.  

He was beaten up while in police custody and convicted for corruption in 1999 and for ‘sodomy’ in 2000. He remained imprisoned until 2004 when the “sodomy” conviction was overturned.

The criminalization of consensual sexual activity between adults – including those of the same sex – is contrary to international human rights law.

“No person should be detained for consensual sex with another adult – it is not a recognisable criminal offence under international law. The ‘sodomy’ law should be removed from the books altogether,” said Richard Bennett.

 

Source: http://aimalaysia.org/content/malaysia-end-persecution-anwar-ibrahim-and...

 

Khaw Boon Wan: We have many PAP MPs who care a lot about animals

$
0
0

We have many MPs who care a lot about animal welfare. So when I broached the subject of updating our legislation to raise the standard of care for animals, a few of them spoke out passionately. I decided that we should work together on this.

First, I asked MP Yeo Guat Kwang to chair the Animal Welfare Legislation Review Committee (AWLRC) to review the subject comprehensively. He took an inclusive approach, inviting many representatives from animal welfare groups, vets, community, grassroots leaders and the pet industry to join his Committee.

Second, Mr Yeo’s Committee consulted widely. This was necessary as issues relating to the welfare of pet animals evoke strong reactions among our residents. They are not in agreement on how best to ensure the welfare of animals while balancing the interests of the various stakeholders.

Third, patiently, Mr Yeo sought out common ground and settled on what was do-able and acceptable to most, if not all. Their final report of recommendations was a good piece of work, to which MND readily accepted.

Under normal arrangement, the next step would be for MND to work with the AG’s Chambers to draft a Bill for the necessary legislative amendments. I decided that it would be wonderful if Mr Yeo could rope in a few more MPs, to do the follow up by presenting a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to amend the Animals and Birds Act.

In our Parliament history, there have not been many Private Member’s Bills. On MND matters, there has been none.

So, MPs Yeo Guat Kwang, Alex Yam, Gan Thiam Poh, Edwin Tong and Vikram Nair, made history when they tabled their Bill for first reading early this month.  If passed, the Bill will give teeth to many of the recommendations put forth by the AWLRC. It will set new animal welfare standards for individuals and businesses in Singapore, and engender greater responsibility amongst pet owners.  It will also update the penalties for convicted acts of animal cruelty.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

The Bill is the fruit of more than two years of hard work. Numerous consultations were organised to ensure that all views were considered. It reflects a diversity of perspectives from animal lovers and those who are less comfortable being around animals. We need the understanding and cooperation of all, as we try to balance these diverse views. The key objective is to achieve a harmonious living environment for everyone. In this journey towards higher animal welfare standards, Mr Yeo’s Bill marks a big step forward for us and our companion animals.

 

Khaw Boon Wan

National Development Minister

[Source]:  KBW’s blog: mndsingapore.wordpress.com

Fees charged for transit wards in hospitals

$
0
0

BY GERALD GIAM -- Article first appeared on http://geraldgiam.sg

USE OF MEDISAVE FOR PATIENTS IN TRANSIT WARDS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS IN HOSPITALS

The following question stood in the name of Mr Zainal Sapari –
10 To ask the Minister for Health (a) what is the average length of time that a person will be in the transit ward of the Accident and Emergency Department of a public hospital before getting a bed at the subsidised wards; and (b) whether the Ministry can allow patients who are in transit wards to use their Medisave for payment during their stay there.

11 Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Minister for Health (a) which public hospitals charge patients for (i) temporary beds in tents; (ii) beds in the corridors outside the wards; or (iii) beds in the ward corridors but not in ward rooms; (b) how all these rates differ from beds in the ward room; and (c) whether stays in temporary beds in tents and in the corridors, outside and inside the ward, qualify for Medisave use or MediShield Life claims.

Mr Zainudin Nordin (Bishan-Toa Payoh): Question No 10.

The Minister for Health (Mr Gan Kim Yong): Madam, may I take both Question Nos 10 and 11 together.

Mdm Speaker: Yes, please.

Mr Gan Kim Yong: Madam, for 2013, the median time for admission to a ward from the Emergency Department was about 2.5 hours.

Patients at the Emergency Departments are prioritised and attended to based on the severity of their conditions. While patients wait to be admitted to an inpatient bed, they will continue to receive medical treatment, nursing care, clinical monitoring and other services, as well as meals that they may require during this transit period. Their safety and care remain the focus of our care teams at the Emergency Departments.

During the transit period, patients would be charged for services that have been rendered. Medisave and MediShield can be used for these charges if the patients are subsequently warded, subject to the prevailing daily and other limits, and the number of inpatient days of stay.

We have received appeals and queries earlier about the computation of Medisave and MediShield claims for patients who received treatment before their inpatient beds were ready. Some hospitals commence inpatient charges only when the patients are transferred to a ward and taken care of by the inpatient team. Ward charges are not imposed during the transit period at the Emergency Department and, consequently, the transit period does not count towards the inpatient days in the computation of Medisave and MediShield claims. Other hospitals consider patients as inpatient once they are taken care of by the inpatient team, even during the transit period. The time during this period contributes towards the length of stay and patients will benefit from higher claims for Medisave and MediShield.

We are reviewing these two ways of computation to see how we can streamline the practices across public hospitals to minimise confusion.

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song (Non-Constituency Member): A few supplementary questions. I think the Minister basically has said that different hospitals have different practices right now. Can the Minister clarify which are the hospitals that do charge for the temporary beds and which are those that do not?

For the hospitals that charge for the temporary beds, do they charge at the same rate as for beds inside the wards or do they have a discounted rate? The patients on temporary beds are already putting up with a fair degree of discomfort and inconvenience. Would the Minister agree that as long as the bed is not inside the ward, and inside a room, that they should be eligible for a lower rate, and should be allowed to use their Medisave and MediShield where eligible, as well as receive all the C Class ward subsidies? Thank you.

Mr Gan Kim Yong: Madam, I thank the Member for the questions. Firstly, he asked which are the hospitals that charge for temporary beds in the transit area. The Changi General Hospital and the Singapore General Hospital consider the patients as inpatients once they are taken over by the inpatient team and, therefore, their stay during the Emergency Department after they have been taken over by the inpatient team will be charged according to the wards.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

He also asked whether there are different rates charged. When the patients are transferred to the ward, they receive the same level of care and treatment as all other patients. So, generally, they will be subjected to the same charges that are imposed at the respective wards, whether they are B2 or C Classes. But some hospitals do exercise some flexibility, taking into account the environment and whether there is a need to help the patients. So some hospitals do offer reduced charges for some of these wards, taking into account various factors.

—-

Source: Singapore Parliament Reports

Get my latest updates. ‘Like’ my Facebook Page.

 

​Gerald Giam

*Article first appeared on http://geraldgiam.sg/2014/11/fees-charged-for-transit-wards-in-hospitals/

 

Gerald Giam: Special access for Indian businesses under CECA

$
0
0

[NCMP Gerald Giam | Article first appeared on www.geraldgiam.sg]

Parliamentary Question on 8 October 2014

UPDATE ON SPECIAL ACCESS FOR INDIAN BUSINESSES UNDER BILATERAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Minister for Trade and Industry if he will provide an update on the Comprehensive Economic Co-operation Agreement (CECA) negotiations and, specifically, whether India is entitled to special access to Singapore’s labour market or banking licences under the terms of CECA.

The Minister for Trade and Industry (Mr Lim Hng Kiang): Mdm Speaker, the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) entered into force on 1 August 2005. CECA provides for reviews to examine issues related to the Agreement. The first review was completed in 2007 and the second review is on-going.

CECA has increased trade and investment flows between India and Singapore. Bilateral trade grew from S$16.6 billion in 2005 to S$25.5 billion in 2013. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from India into Singapore grew from S$1.3 billion in 2005 to S$20 billion in 2012. This has helped to create good jobs for Singaporeans.

CECA serves to bring conveniences to businesses by allowing temporary entry on both sides for certain categories of persons, including business visitors, professionals, and Intra-Corporate Transferees.

Under CECA, Singapore agreed to grant three bank licences with Qualifying Full Bank (QFB) privileges to Indian banks, subject to the prudential requirements of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Two Indian QFBs, namely State Bank of India and ICICI Bank, have been approved to date. At the same time, India agreed to allow the three Singapore banks to open a total of 15 bank branches in India and 11 branches have been approved so far.

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song (Non-Constituency Member): I have two supplementary questions, Madam. I understand that India is claiming that our Work Pass framework, which has been tightened in recent years, somehow violates CECA, or they are saying that they are entitled to allow more workers to come in here. So, can the Minister share with us his interpretation of what India’s claims are?

Secondly, can the Minister also share Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI)’s position on this, and also give us an assurance that the Government will stand up to pressure from the Indians to allow more of their nationals to work here?

Mr Lim Hng Kiang: Under the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) that we negotiated, there is an exchange of preferential treatment. In India’s case, in CECA’s case, one of the privileges we extend to India was to create greater conveniences for business people to move between the two countries, Singaporean businessmen to India, and vice versa.

One category is Intra-Corporate Transferees. That means if you got employees that you have employed and you are setting up a business in Singapore, we facilitate the transfer of your corporate employees to help you set up and run the business.

Tags: 
Wrap Text field: 

Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) in World Trade Organization (WTO), we grant such Intra-Corporate Transferees, say five years. In India’s case, we allow them to do so for eight years. These are the kind of privileges.

All these privileges do not deviate from our right to apply measures to regulate the entry as well as a temporary stay. So, the overall immigration and employment rules that we regulate have to be maintained. But where the special privileges are negotiated in the FTA, then, of course, the counter-party will enjoy those privileges. And we will follow these rules strictly.

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: Madam, I understand the point about the privileges. My question is, are we granting them all the privileges that they are entitled to under the CECA, or are they saying that we are not granting them enough? If it is the latter, would that mean that, effectively, the Indians are asking for more Work Passes for themselves?

Mr Lim Hng Kiang: The privileges are clearly delineated in the FTAs and in CECA. As I had explained just now, say, for example, Intra-Corporate Transferees, if the Indians dispute that we are not giving them eight years as we agreed, then they can refer the case to us and, ultimately, there is a dispute settlement process.

—–

Source: Singapore Parliament Reports

 

Gerald Giam

*Article first appeared on www.GeraldGiam.sg

 
Viewing all 937 articles
Browse latest View live